Posters

Cataract Surgery Equipment/Instrumentation/Surgical Devices/OVDs

• 1.8 mm limbal manual implantation of a hydrophobic trifocal IOL
  C.Tabatabay SWITZERLAND
• A new trifocal technology IOL to correct presbyopia in cataract patients
  M.Piovella ITALY
• Agreement of a Scheimpflug-based topography and swept-source optical biometry astigmatism measurements
  G.Neri Pires PORTUGAL
• Analysis of AutonoMe/Clareon injector system using an intraocular endoscopic camera
  G.Auffarth GERMANY
• Axial length as a factor associated with visual outcome after uncomplicated phacoemulsification cataract surgery
  S.Matic CROATIA
• Clinical and economic comparison between conventional drop regimes and Mydriasert implant in preoperative dilatation for cataract surgery
  A.Ng UK
• Comparison analysis of two swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT)-based biometers
  F.Sabatino UK
• Comparison of hydrophilic Rayner RayOne Aspheric and HOYA iSert 251 aspheric IOLs for compatibility with their own disposable preloaded injection systems in terms of surgeon facilitation, safety, and intraoperative complications
  Z.Mazhry PAKISTAN
• Comparison of intraocular lens implantation with and without viscoelastic material in standard phacoemulsification surgery
  Y.Ayaz TURKEY
• Comparison of intraocular lens power formulas using optical low coherence reflectometry in cataract patients
  G.Kaya TURKEY
• Comparison of IOLMaster500 vs AL-Scan based on postoperative results: a retrospective analysis
  A.Arsan TURKEY
• Comparison of ocular biometric measurement using two biometers with different principles
  V.Vaishnav INDIA
• Comparison of the accuracy of various biometric formulas according to preoperative anterior chamber depth
  M.Aslan TURKEY
• Comparison of two versions of combined ultrasound settings for hard nucleus removal with the help of femtosecond laser
  S.Shukhaev RUSSIA
• Comparison of visual performance after implantation of bifocal and trifocal intraocular lenses having identical platform
  Y.Huang CHINA
• Controlled pressure infusion can prevent endothelial damage in phacoemulsification
  S.Pini ITALY
• Corneal incision architecture after intraocular lens implantation using manual and automated preloaded delivery systems
  M.Cennamo ITALY
• Corneal incision architecture and corneal trauma after IOL implantation with a new automated preloaded delivery system
  E.D'Ugo ITALY
• Effect of a new dual-viscoelastic device on endothelial corneal cells and intraocular pressure in cataract surgery: a comparative study
  G.Monaco ITALY
• Effect of multiple usage of viscoelastics during phacoemulsification on high risk group of corneal endothelial cell loss
  J.Oh KOREA
• Efficacy and safety of an injector-free preloaded delivery system for the new B-HEX pupil expander
  S.Bhattacharjee INDIA
• Efficacy of mechanical dilation devices in cataract surgery
  F.Crenguta ROMANIA
• Endothelial cell protection achieved by no ultrasound torsional phacoemulsification
  S.Moreni ITALY
• Evaluating the safety of intraocular lens or intraocular telescope implant and scleral fixation using a lens exchange system (LES)
  M.Gharra ISRAEL
• Flapless and sutureless intrascleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lens for correction of aphakia
  E.Can TURKEY
• Focusing on dense cataract ARGOS performance: comparison between axial length measurement before and after cataract surgery
  C.Palmisano ITALY
• Helvacioglu coefficient optimising factor for torsional phacoemulsification
  F.Helvacioglu TURKEY
• In vitro behavior of different ophthalmic viscosurgical devices on the corneal endothelium during cataract surgery
  T.Yildirim GERMANY
• Influence of the irrigation-port location of the phaco sleeve on ophthalmic viscosurgical device retention during phacoemulsification
  N.Shiratori JAPAN
• Initial clinical results implanting the new Clareon® aspheric hydrophobic acrylic IOL using AutonoMe™ automated pre-loaded delivery system
  K.Gundersen NORWAY
• Intraindividual comparison of marking precision between the computer-assisted system Callisto and the manual pendular marker Tomark
  B.von Jagow GERMANY
• Intraoperative aberrometry in post radial keratotomy eyes for IOL power calculation
  S.Khokhar INDIA
• Modified 30G needle under air trypan blue (TB) dye anterior capsule staining technique vs under viscoadaptive substance staining technique
  S.Mahajan INDIA
• Nanolaser cataract surgery: correlation between post-surgery anterior chamber flare and short-term endothelial cell density
  C.Cagini ITALY
• Navigation system Verion image-guided system in calculating the optical power of premium intraocular lenses
  V.Stebnev RUSSIA
• Outcomes of a multicentric study comparing bilateral bifocal implantation with mix-and-match option
  B.Jihen TUNISIA
• Prechop without prechoppers outside the capsular bag in small capsulorhexis
  A.Pérez-Arteaga MEXICO
• Precision pulse capsulotomy: initial clinical experience in simple and challenging cataract surgery cases
  V.Kankariya INDIA
• Punchorhexis in white intumescent cataract
  M.Rajan INDIA
• Pupil dilators in surgery of complicated cataracts
  S.Stebnev RUSSIA
• Refractive and aberrometric results after implantation of a hydrophobic acrylic aspheric IOL with newly designed, lower glare edge
  F.Camesasca ITALY
• Think hexagon instead of square for pupil expanders
  S.Bhattacharjee INDIA
• To retrospectively test for differences between the absolute prediction error (PE) using an intraoperative aberrometer (aberrometry prediction error) and the surgeon preoperative formula-estimated absolute prediction
  M.Breen USA
• Visual outcome, spectacle independence, and patient satisfaction after femto laser-assisted phacoemulsification with trifocal IOL implantation
  W.Ghobashy UAE
• Vitrector-assisted capsulotomy in complex case scenarios: a novel technique
  D.Megur INDIA
• Which capsulorhexis pattern offered by the navigation system provides the best concentricity with the intraocular lens?
  E.Palkovičová CZECH REPUBLIC