Course handouts are now available
Click here
Come to London
WATCH to find out why
Site updates:
Programme Updates. Programme Overview and - Video Symposium on Challenging Cases now available.
Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery followed by coaxial phacoemulsification or microincisional cataract surgery: differences and advantages
(results will display both Free Papers & Poster)
Session Details
Session Title: Femtocataract I
Session Date/Time: Sunday 14/09/2014 | 08:00-10:00
Paper Time: 08:18
Venue: Boulevard A
First Author: : F.Soria SPAIN
Co Author(s): : J. Alió A. Abdou P. Peña-Garcia L. Bataille
Abstract Details
Purpose:
Review the advantages and the differences of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) following a coaxial or microincision cataract surgery phacoemulsification in the surgical outcome and greater control of cataract surgery.
Setting:
Vissum Corporation, Alicante-Spain
Methods:
Prospective, randomized, observational, comparative
case series clinical study was carried out for
50 cataractous eyes selected to be operated with
FLACS followed by a bimanual MICS technique(25 patients) (Group A) and a coaxial phacoemulsification
technique (25 patients) (Group B).
(1) Evaluation of surgical efficiency:
(a) Mean Ultrasonic Power(b) Values of EPT
(2) Evaluation of the visual and refractive
outcomes:
(a) Postoperative Spherical Equivalent
(b) High-Order Aberration (Corneal and Internal)
(c) Visual Efficacy Index
(3) Other examinations were evaluated by assessing
the corneal pachymetry, endothelial cell count,
macular thickness and incidents during and
after surgery.
Results:
The efficacy index for FemtoMICS
was 160.2 and 149% for Femto Coaxial measured
at 1 month after surgery. No significant differences
were found in corneal pachymetry, endothelial
cell count and macular thickness. The mean total
corneal HOAs (6mm) both, before and after surgery
were 0.6 ±0.4 and 0.66 ±0.2mm, respectively (P=0.1). The mean value for internal coma
(4mm) for both procedures was 0.13 mm. The
visual index for FemtoMICS was 160.2 and 149%for FemtoCoaxial measured at 1 month after
surgery. The mean power of ultrasound for MICS was 1.8± 0.9% and
for 2.2mm incisions was 14.7±4.9% (P<0.001).
EPT values for MICS and 2.2mm incisions were
1.5±0.9 and 4.5±2.9 s. (P=0.002), respectively.
Conclusions:
FemtoMICS appears to be surgically and statistically
more efficient than the FemtoCoaxial technique
and Femtoincisions prove to be stable and do
not change the corneal high-order aberration
significantly with favorable results of the triplanar
configuration.
Financial Interest:
NONE