Course handouts are now available
Click here
Come to London
WATCH to find out why
Site updates:
Programme Updates. Programme Overview and - Video Symposium on Challenging Cases now available.
Posters
(results will display both Free Papers & Poster)
Visual outcomes after refractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation into one eye and diffractive lens into the other eye
Poster Details
First Author: U.Gunenc TURKEY
Co Author(s): R. Yildirim Karabag G. Arikan H. Aslankara
Abstract Details
Purpose:
To assess the visual outcomes in patients who underwent cataract surgery with
multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation using a 'mix & match' approach.
Setting:
Dokuz Eylul University, School of Medicine, Dep of Ophthalmology, Izmir - Turkey
Methods:
Prospective. Twenty patients (40 eyes) were involved in this prospective, nonrandomized, casecontrol
study. Refractive multifocal IOLs (ReZoom NXG1) were implanted in patients'
dominant eyes and diffractive multifocal IOLs (Tecnis ZMA00) were implanted in their nondominant
eyes. Patients were followed for 6 months. Monoocular and binocular uncorrected
distance, intermediate and near vision acuity (logMAR), contrast sensitivity levels were
measured 1, 3 and 6 months later after cataract surgery. Defocus curves, reading speeds,
patient satisfaction, spectacle dependence, halo and glare symptoms were also evaluated at 6
month after the surgery. Postoperative quality of life was assessed with the Turkish version of
NEI VFQ-25 (National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25).
Results:
The study group consists of 8 females and 12 males, with mean age 69.45 ± 10.76
(31-86) years. At 6 months after the surgery the mean spherical equivalent was -0.04 ± 0.12
D in ReZoom implanted eyes and -0.11 ± 0.2 D in Tecnis implanted eyes. The uncorrected
distance and intermediate visual acuity levels were significantly better in ReZoom implanted
eyes at 6 months after the surgery (p=0.026 and p=0.037,respectively). There was no
statistically significant difference in the uncorrected near viasual acuity (p>0.05). At the final
visit, the mean binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity was -0.05±0.1 logMAR, the mean
binocular uncorrected intemediate visual acuity was 0.1±0.2 logMAR and the mean binocular
uncorrected near visual acuity was 0.1±0.1 logMAR. There was no statistically significant
difference in contrast sensitivity, reading speed, halos, or glare between the groups (p<0.05).
Contrast sensitivity measurements under photopic and mesopic conditions were within
normal limits during all the follow-up periods. The mean patient satisfaction was 95% and all
patients were totally spectacle independent. A low degree of glare/halo was detected in 40%
of the subjects. There was no postoperative complication.
Conclusions:
Mixing and matching multifocal IOLs in selected cataract patients provide an
excellent visual outcome, a high level of patient satisfaction and spectacle independency. FINANCIAL INTEREST: NONE