Course handouts are now available
Click here
Come to London
WATCH to find out why
Site updates:
Programme Updates. Programme Overview and - Video Symposium on Challenging Cases now available.
Posters
(results will display both Free Papers & Poster)
Anterior chamber versus posterior chamber intraocular lens in DMEK for pseudophakic bullous keratopathy
Poster Details
First Author: V.Liarakos GREECE
Co Author(s): L. Ham K. van Dijk L. Baydoun E. Livny H. van Esch G. Melles
Abstract Details
Purpose:
To evaluate the presence of an anterior chamber intraocular lens (AC-IOL) as a potential factor affecting the feasibility and outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in eyes with pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK).
Setting:
Netherlands Institute for Innovative Ocular Surgery
Methods:
DMEK was performed in 34 consecutive eyes diagnosed with PBK. In 7 eyes DMEK was performed in the presence of an iris-claw AC-IOL, whereas the remaining 27 eyes carried a PC-IOL. Endothelial cell density (ECD) decrease as well as intra- and post-operative complications were documented. Anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements were particularly evaluated for the AC-IOL group.
Results:
DMEK was successfully completed without any significant intraoperative complications in all eyes, regardless of the type of the IOL. No AC-IOL was removed or exchanged. No significant difference in ECD decrease was observed between the two groups at 6 months (44 (±15) % in the AC-IOL group compared to 43 (±18) % in the PC-IOL group; P=0.91). In the AC-IOL group, central and mean peripheral ACD were measured to be 2.44 (±0.19) mm and 2.10 (±0.08) mm postoperatively (compared to 2.24(±0.31) mm and 1.78 (±0.20) mm preoperatively; P=0.40 and P=0.03 respectively). The most common postoperative complication was significant partial graft detachment, observed in one case with an AC-IOL and 5 cases with a PC-IOL (14% and 19%, respectively).
Conclusions:
The presence of a stable iris-claw AC-IOL did not affect ECD decrease or complications rate and was not considered a contra-indication in cases with PBK operated on with DMEK. FINANCIAL INTEREST: One of more of the authors... receives consulting fees, retainer, or contract payments from a competing company