Official ESCRS | European Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgeons
Vienna 2018 Delegate Registration Programme Exhibition Virtual Exhibition Satellites 2018 Survey

 

escrs app advert

Changes in ocular biometrics measured using the IOLMaster after implantation of a phakic intraocular lens

Search Title by author or title

Session Details

Session Title: Presented Poster Session: Refractive Surgery New Techniques/Instrumentation/Devices III

Venue: Poster Village: Pod 2

First Author: : B.Park SOUTH KOREA

Co Author(s): :    D. Ham   J. Lee   G. Ryu                 

Abstract Details

Purpose:

To measure changes in ocular biometrics required for calculating intraocular lens powers during cataract surgery on phakic eyes undergoing implantation of a collamer lens (AQUA ICL [STAAR Surgical Company, monrovia, california, USA] or an Artiflex® lens [Ophtec BV, Groningen, The Netherlands]) to correct myopia.

Setting:

Nunevit eye clinic & Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea

Methods:

A total of 45 eyes of 23 patients who underwent implantation of iris-fixated or posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses (pIOLs) for correction of myopia >−7D were evaluated using the euphakic mode of the IOL Master® 500 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) prior to pIOL implantation. After implantation, the axial length (AL) and anterior chamber depth (ACD) were measured 1 month postoperatively using both the euphakic and pseudophakic modes of the instrument. We compared differences between predicted IOL powers calculated using the Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff/Theoretical (SRK/T) and Haigis formulae.

Results:

Seventeen eyes receiving ICL and 28 Artiflex® pIOL implants were included in the study. After pIOL implantation, ALs measured by the euphakic and pseudophakic modes of the IOL Master were significantly longer (p = 0.031, p < 0.0001) and ACDs significantly shorter (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, respectively) than preoperatively. The changes after surgery were less when the euphakic rather than the pseudophakic measurement mode was employed. The postoperative IOL powers predicted by the SRK/T (−0.03D, p = 0.023) and Haigis formulae (−0.06D, p = 0.001) were significantly lower that the preoperative values.

Conclusions:

After pIOL implantation, AL changes were less when measured using the euphakic rather than the pseudophakic mode of the IOL Master. Although the ACDs differed significantly after pIOL implantation, the changes were too small to influence IOL power calculations. ACD measurements differed significantly from those of AL after IOL implantation. Thus, a pIOL implantation history may affect biometric findings during cataract surgery.

Financial Disclosure:

None

Back to previous