Analysis of different approaches to enhance range-of-vision: functional results, patient satisfaction, and disphotopic phenomena
Session Details
Session Title: Extended Depth-of-Focus IOL Concepts
Session Date/Time: Monday 24/09/2018 | 08:00-10:30
Paper Time: 08:18
Venue: Room A4
First Author: : F.Kretz GERMANY
Co Author(s): : I. Kaiser S. Teisch R. Lucchesi C. Herbers M. Gerl D. Breyer
Abstract Details
Purpose:
To evaluate the refractive & functional results, defocus curve, disphotopic phenomena and patient satisfaction and after binocular implantation of an enhanced depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) compared to a Mix & Match approach with the same IOL in the distance dominant eye and a trifocal IOL in the near dominant eye.
Setting:
Augenärzte Gerl, Kretz & Kollegen, Member of the International Vision Correction Research Centre Network (IVCRC.net), Dept. of Ophthalmology, Univ. of Heidelberg, Germany
Methods:
In a prospective study cataract patients received either binocular an EDOF IOL (AT LARA 829, Carl Zeiss Meditech, Germany) targeted emmetropia (EDOF group) or the same IOL in their distance dominant eye and a trifocal IOL (AT LISA 839, Carl Zeiss Meditech, Germany) in their near dominant eye (Mix&Match group). Pre- and postoperative, monocular and binocular functional results (CDVA, UDVA, DCIVA [90cm, 80cm, 60cm], DCNVA, UNVA, Defocus curve; [logMAR]) refractive outcome, Halo and Glare Simulator and patient satisfaction score were evaluated.
Results:
91% in the EDOF and 77% in the Mix&Match group had a postoperative SE in between 0.75D. Mean binocular UDVA, CDVA, DCIVA (90cm, 80cm and 60CM) DCNVA in the EDOF and the Mix&Match group were -0.03, -0.05, -0.02, 0.03, 0.05, 0.33 (EDOF group) and -0.05, 0.00, -0.05, 0.13, -0.08, 0.02 (Mix&Match group), respectively. Halo & Glare analysis showed 85,8% of EDOF patients reporting none to mild and 100% of Mix & Match patients reporting mild to moderate strength. The Mix&Match group questionnaire evaluation showed a higher degree of spectacle independence in near distance compared to the EDOF group.
Conclusions:
Both groups show a high degree of patient satisfaction. The Mix & Match approach clearly shows a higher degree of spectacle independence in near, while still resulting in a slightly higher perception of disphotopic phenomena compared to the EDOF group. Careful patient selection is the key for individualized presbyopia treatment.
Financial Disclosure:
... receives consulting fees, retainer, or contract payments from a company producing, developing or supplying the product or procedure presented, ... travel has been funded, fully or partially, by a competing company, ... travel has been funded, fully or partially, by a company producing, developing or supplying the product or procedure presented, ... research is funded, fully or partially, by a competing company, ... research is funded, fully or partially, by a company producing, developing or supplying the product or procedure presented, ... receives non-monetary benefits from a competing company., ... receives non-monetary benefits from a company producing, developing or supplying the product or procedure presented., ... receives consulting fees, retainer, or contract payments from a competing company