Official ESCRS | European Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgeons

 

Posters

Search Title by author or title

Comparison between the real safe distance vs the simulated safe distance using anterior segment OCT in patients with phakic IOL according to iris configuration

Poster Details

First Author: L.Izquierdo Jr PERU

Co Author(s):    M. Camino   R. Zúñiga   K. Ruíz Montenegro   J. Camargo   C. Maldonado   M. Henriquez     

Abstract Details

Purpose:

To compare the real safe distance (RSD) versus the simulated safe distance (SSD) to the endothelium prior and after iris-claw phakic IOL (pIOL) implantation according to iris configuration assessed pre and postoperatively with the anterior segment OCT (AS-OCT).

Setting:

Oftalmosalud, Lima, Perú.

Methods:

Prospective, cohort study included 60 eyes of 35 patients, who underwent iris-claw pIOL implantation (Artisan,Ophthec) for surgical correction of myopia at Oftalmosalud Instituto de Ojos, Perú, between July 2016 to July 2018.The SSD preoperatively was assessed using AS-OCT and the postoperative RSD was assessed after 1 month of pIOL implantation. Safe distance was defined as the distance between the edge of the optic (simulated or real) to the endothelium. Eyes were divided into 3 groups: plane, concave and convex according to pre-operatory iris configuration. Statistical analysis was performed using the R program, Wilconcox signed rank test and Kruskal Wallis test.

Results:

Mean difference between simulated and real safe temporal distance was -0.3937± 0.3824, -0.073±0.317 and -0.2421±0.3297mm in the concave, convex and plane group respectively. There were statistical significant differences between simulated and real temporal distance in the concave and plane group (p=0.001 and p=0.001 respectively). Mean difference between simulated and real safe nasal distance to the endothelium was 0.41±0.42, -0.20±0.39 and -0.18±0.30mm in the concave, convex and plane group respectively. There were statistical significant differences between simulated and real nasal distance in the concave and plane group (p=0.001 and p=0.002 respectively).

Conclusions:

There were significant differences between simulated and real safe distance in the concave and plane group when evaluation patients with iris-claw phakic IOL.

Financial Disclosure:

None

Back to Poster listing