Session Title: Assessment of Astigmatism
Session Date/Time: Saturday 05/10/2013 | 11:00-12:30
Paper Time: 11:18
Venue: Main Lecture Hall (Ground Floor)
First Author: : M.Goggin AUSTRALIA
Co Author(s): : T. Greenwell Z. Katherine A. Paul
Purpose:
To compare measurements of anterior and total corneal astigmatism to refractive astigmatic in patients with spherical IOL’s
Setting:
Publicly funded hospital and private hospital
Methods:
40 eyes of 27 patients underwent coaxial microincision cataract surgery receiving a spherical intraocular lens implant. Manifest subjective refraction was determined at least 6 weeks postoperatively. At the same visit corneal measurements were obtained using a Nidek keratometer (Nidek Co., Gamagori, Japan) and one of two rotating Scheimpflug cameras (Pentacam, Oculus Inc., Wetzlar, Germany; or Precisio, iVis Technologies, Taranto, Italy). Ocular residual astigmatism (ORA) was defined by comparing the refractive outcome and corneal power measurements using vector analysis.
Results:
The ORA using Scheimpflug total corneal power was 0.6 dioptres (D) (SD = 0.2) for Pentacam and 0.9 D (SD = 0.5) for Precisio. ORA using Nidek keratometry was 0.7 D (SD = 0.5). ORA using Scheimpflug anterior corneal power was 1.3 D (SD = 0.9) for Pentacam and 1.0 D (SD = 0.6) for Precisio.
Conclusions:
Accounting for anterior and posterior surface curvature in calculating corneal power may provide more accurate prediction of ocular residual astigmatism compared with anterior corneal power alone.
Financial Interest:
NONE
Please wait while information is loading.