First Author: A.Galand BELGIUM
Co Author(s):
Purpose:
To consider potential evolution in material,size and shape of implants for capsular fixation.
Setting:
Cataract Clinic
Neupré Ličge Belgium
Methods:
Retrospective assessment of 23 one-piece models in a series of 4,220 eyes with a follow-up from 1 to 10 years.
Results:
a) Less dysphotopsiae with hydrophilics. Implants with the highest hydrophilicity (73 % water content) induce the lowest glare.
b) Less posterior capsule opacification with hydrophobics.
c) Material opacification in the Hydroview model.
d) Many implants are either too big or too rigid , creating capsular striae.
e) Refractive surprises and loop bending with some vaulted haptics.
f) Optic tilt with some J-loop models.
Conclusions:
IOLs for the capsular bag might be improved by resorting to the following features :
a) Low refractive index.
b) Smaller overall diameter or increased flexibility.
c) Cardinal haptic junctions to avoid capsulorhexis capture.
d) No angulation when haptic is soft. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE?: No
Please wait while information is loading.