Official ESCRS | European Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgeons
Copenhagen 2016 Registration Programme Exhibitor Information Virtual Exhibition Satellite Meetings Glaucoma Day 2016 Hotel Star Alliance
title

10 - 14 Sept. 2016, Bella Center, Copenhagen, Denmark

This Meeting has been awarded 27 CME credits

 

escrs app advert yo advert

Posters

Search Title by author or title

Serum vitamin D level in patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma

Poster Details

First Author: W. Shihadeh JORDAN

Co Author(s):    M. Belal   M. Al-Hashimi   A. Al-Dabbagh   S. Jaradat   Y. Khader        

Abstract Details

Purpose:

To compare the level of serum vitamin D in patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome (XFS) and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (XFG) with that in control subjects. Moreover, to compare the associated systemic diseases in the two groups

Setting:

Jordan University of Science & Technology King Abdullah University Hospital JORDAN

Methods:

Serum levels of 25-hydroxy vitamin D [25(OH) D] were measured using liquid chromatography. Variables like age, sex and medical history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus and ischemic heart disease were reported. Measurements of vitamin D level were classified as normal (20-70 ng/ml), insufficient (10-less than 20 ng/ml) and deficient ( less than 10 ng/ml).

Results:

This study included a total of 55 patients with XFS/XFG and 60 subjects control subjects. Patients with XFS/XFG were significantly older than control subjects (mean age; 71.8 vs. 67.5 year, p-value = 0.002). Gender distribution was similar for the two groups. The prevalence rates of diabetes, hypertension, and ischemic heart disease were not significantly different.The mean of 25-hydroxy vitamin D was 14.7 ng/mL for patients with XFS/XFG and 14.9 ng/mL for control subjects with no significant difference. The prevalence rate of vitamin D deficiency at different levels of 25-hydroxy vitamin D was not significantly different. Multivariate analysis did not show significant difference in vitamin D deficiency between the two groups after adjusting for age, gender, and medical conditions.

Conclusions:

Vitamin D levels were low in both the XFS/XFG group and the control group being lower in the first one but with no significant difference. The prevalence rates of systemic diseases were not significantly different between the two groups.

Financial Disclosure:

NONE

Back to Poster listing