Official ESCRS | European Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgeons
Copenhagen 2016 Registration Programme Exhibitor Information Virtual Exhibition Satellite Meetings Glaucoma Day 2016 Hotel Star Alliance
title

10 - 14 Sept. 2016, Bella Center, Copenhagen, Denmark

This Meeting has been awarded 27 CME credits

 

escrs app advert yo advert

Posters

Search Title by author or title

Manual vs laser capsulotomy strength: inter-eye comparison

Poster Details

First Author: A. Siu AUSTRALIA

Co Author(s):    U. Pattamatta   K. Meades   C. Bala              

Abstract Details

Purpose:

To compare prospectively between eyes the capsulotomy tear force need to break the explanted capsule and the CDE needed to remove the lens during FLACS and manual cataract surgery.

Setting:

Clinical trial Personaleyes, Australia

Methods:

36 patients were prospectively recruited to have FLACS (Lensx, Alcon) in the worse eye and manual surgery in the better eye. The ocular scatter inder (Accutarget, a surrogate marker for cataract density) and the cumulative dissipated energy needed to explant the lens was measured. The discarded capsule was mounted between two clamps and the breaking force was measured. The subjected to a force required to ter

Results:

The force needed to tear the capsule extracted after manual surgery was 2.16g± 0.42g (mean ± SEM). There was no significant difference (p>0.99) when compared with FLACS capsulotomy (2.19± 0.38g; mean ± SEM). The CDE required was 15% to 50% lower with FLACS. A larger reduction in CDE was noted for denser cataracts.

Conclusions:

There is no significant difference in the tear strength of the discarded capsule between Lensx FLACS and manual surgery. In denser cataracts there is a marked reduction the amount of CDE required using FLACs for lens removal compared with manual surgery

Financial Disclosure:

One or more of the authors research is funded, fully or partially, by a company producing, developing or supplying the product or procedure presented, One or more of the authors travel has been funded, fully or partially, by a company producing, developing or supplying the product or procedure presented

Back to Poster listing