Official ESCRS | European Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgeons
Copenhagen 2016 Registration Programme Exhibitor Information Virtual Exhibition Satellite Meetings Glaucoma Day 2016 Hotel Star Alliance
title

10 - 14 Sept. 2016, Bella Center, Copenhagen, Denmark

This Meeting has been awarded 27 CME credits

 

escrs app advert yo advert

Posters

Search Title by author or title

Descriptive evaluation of postoperative residual refractive astigmatism and outcome distribution using intraoperative aberrometry

Poster Details

First Author: M. Breen UNITED STATES

Co Author(s):    R. Lehmann                    

Abstract Details

Purpose:

To evaluate post-operative (21-35 day) mean refractive astigmatism outcomes and residual refractive astigmatism distribution after using intraoperative aberrometry during lens replacement procedures to guide cylinder power selection and axis of placement.

Setting:

Prospective, multicenter, masked evaluator study

Methods:

Subjects (n=84) were analyzed for this prospective, multicenter, masked evaluator study. Evaluators were masked to treatment and toric IOL type. Data related to mean pre- and post-operative refractive astigmatism were collected and analyzed. The distribution of post-operative residual refractive astigmatism was evaluated.

Results:

Mean pre- and post-operative refractive astigmatism were 1.72D ± 0.75 and 0.26D ± 0.31, respectively. Post-operative residual refractive astigmatism distribution was as follows: ≤0.25D, 69%; ≤0.50D, 89%; ≤0.75D, 94%; ≤1.00D, 99%.

Conclusions:

This descriptive study demonstrated that using intraoperative aberrometry reduced refractive astigmatism with 89% of those cases resulting in ≤0.50D and nearly all (99%) subjects to ≤1.00D with of residual refractive astigmatism.

Financial Disclosure:

One or more of the authors is employed by a forNONEprofit company with an interest in the subject of the presentation, One or more of the authors research is funded, fully or partially, by a company producing, developing or supplying the product or procedure presented, One or more of the authors receives consulting fees, retainer, or contract payments from a company producing, developing or supplying the product or procedure presented

Back to Poster listing