Meeting Highlights Information Registration Visa Letter Application Programme Overview Exhibition Virtual Exhibition Hotels Exhibition Virtual Exhibition Satellite Programme


Posters

Search Abstracts by author or title
(results will display both Free Papers & Poster)

DMEK in Super-Seniors: clinical outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty performed in patients greater than 90 years old

Poster Details


First Author: P.Dockery USA

Co Author(s): J. Parker   L. Ham   C. Parker   J. Parker   G. Melles        

Abstract Details

Purpose:

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) performed in the “oldest old” patients, i.e. ≥ 90 years.

Setting:

Parker Cornea, Birmingham, AL, USA and The Netherlands Institute for Innovative Ocular Surgery (NIIOS), Rotterdam, The The Netherlands

Methods:

Between the years of 2009 and 2019, 20 consecutive eyes of 17 patients aged ≥ 90 underwent DMEK for endothelial dysfunction. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell density (ECD), graft survival, and intra- and postoperative complications were assessed.

Results:

Except in one case in which the DMEK surgery could not be completed, all operated eyes experienced an improvement in BCVA, although only 50% achieved ≥ 20/40 (0.5) by 1 year postoperatively. One year after surgery, median CCT had declined from 641(+/-161) μm to 480 (+/-34) μm (p<0.001), and median endothelial cell density was reduced by 53%, from 2574 (+/-286) to 1226 (+/-404) cells/mm2. Six of 19 eyes receiving DMEK grafts (32%) developed partial graft detachments requiring re-bubbling. One eye experienced a secondary graft failure at 6 months and underwent repeat endothelial keratoplasty.

Conclusions:

DMEK is technically feasible in the oldest old patients and may yield significant visual improvements. Because clinical follow-up may be difficult for these patients, DMEK may be preferable to Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty because the risk of suture related issues and allograft reaction/rejection is lower.

Financial Disclosure:

None

Back to Poster listing