Meeting Highlights Information Registration Visa Letter Application Programme Overview Exhibition Virtual Exhibition Hotels Exhibition Virtual Exhibition Satellite Programme


Posters

Search Abstracts by author or title
(results will display both Free Papers & Poster)

Ocular hypotonia in cataract surgery as a risk factor for Descemet's membrane detachment: the importance of the order of the incisions

Poster Details


First Author: J.Folch Ramos SPAIN

Co Author(s): R. Salvador   E. Ribas Coll                 

Abstract Details

Purpose:

To determine whether ocular hypotonia when performing the main incision in cataract surgery -due to previously performed paracentesis- may influence intra- or post-surgery descemet membrane detachment (DD) development, and if so, whether this could be a maneuver to be avoided. Secondly, to observe whether the intraocular lens and type of injector may also have any influence in this postoperative complication; and, finally, to determine whether anterior chamber depth (ACD) plays also a role.

Setting:

Germanes Hospitalàries del Sagrat Cor de Jesus “Hospital Sant Rafael”, Barcelona

Methods:

Prospective study with 75 consecutive cataract surgeries divided in 2 groups, depending on whether paracentesis was performed before 2.75 mm main incision (group 1) or the other way round (group 2). Any degree of DD observed during surgery or a week later at slit lamp or by OCT was evaluated. 3 different type of lenses (B&L MI60, ALCON SN60AT, J&J TECNIS) were implanted, and overall DD was also analyzed in these groups. Finally, we evaluated any possible relation between ACD (measured during biometry)  and DD development.

Results:

Overall, DD was observed in 52% of the cases, 61.54 % in group 1 (paracentesis first) and 41.66% in group 2 (main incision in the first place). These differences were only statistically significant at the time of surgery, being only a tendency in one week postoperative evaluation, but  without statistical significance (p-value = 0.085). Regarding the lens implanted, DD was observed in 46.16% of cases with Alcon lens, 44% with J&J lens and 66.6% with B&L lens, although these differences were again not statistically significant. Finally,  there was no association between ACD and DD development.

Conclusions:

Our study suggests a tendency towards DD in those cases in which main incision is performed in a hypotonic eye (group 1). Probably, differences were statistically significant only in intraoperative observations (p-value = 0.02512) due to self-resolution of DD during the first postoperative week (as there were no clinically significant DDs), and so, performing paracentesis prior to main incision would be a maneuver to be avoided. This study also suggests that neither the type of lens implanted nor ACD plays a role in DD development, but larger studies should be advisable in order to confirm these tendencies.

Financial Disclosure:

... gains financially from competing product or procedure, ... travel has been funded, fully or partially, by a company producing, developing or supplying the product or procedure presented, ... research is funded, fully or partially, by a company producing, developing or supplying the product or procedure presented, ... receives non-monetary benefits from a company producing, developing or supplying the product or procedure presented, ... receives consulting fees, retainer, or contract payments from a company producing, developing or supplying the product or procedure presented, ... is employed by a competing company, ... has significant investment interest in a company producing, developing or supplying product or procedure presented

Back to Poster listing