Official ESCRS | European Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgeons
Lisbon 2017 Delegate Registration Programme Exhibition Virtual Exhibition Satellites OneWorld Travel Discount
escrs app advert

Posters

Search Title by author or title

Myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) outcomes: a comparative study of three different femtosecond lasers and one mechanical microkeratome, using the same excimer laser

Poster Details

First Author: I.Rodriguez-Perez SPAIN

Co Author(s):    J. Gros-Otero   M. Garcia-Gonzalez   M. Teus-Guezala   A. Rodero-Serrano           

Abstract Details

Purpose:

To compare the visual outcomes using the Intralase�Â�® (Abbott Medical Optics Inc., Santa Ana, California) versus Femto LDV�Â�® (Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG, Port, Switzerland) versus FS200�Â�® (Alcon Laboratories, Inc. Fort Worth, TX, USA) femto-laser platforms, versus Hansatome�Â�® zero-compression (Hansa Research and Development, Miami, Flo, USA) mechanical microkeratome, to perform myopic LASIK with the Allegretto�Â�® (WaveLight Laser Technologie AG) excimer laser.

Setting:

Clinica Novovision de MadridClinica Rementeria, Madrid.

Methods:

This is a retrospective, observational cohort study that included 550 eyes divided in four groups: 134 eyes treated with Intralase were compared to 112 refraction-matched eyes treated with Femto LDV, 206 refraction-matched eyes treated with FS200 and 98 refraction-matched eyes treated with Hansatome. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) and refractive outcomes were evaluated 1 and 7 days, 1 and 3 months postoperatively.

Results:

At day one and seven post-op visits, UDVA was found significantly lower in the FS200 than in the other groups (P=0.0001), but that difference became not significant at the one and the three-month visits. Statistically significant differences were found among groups in terms of safety index (P=0.0001), residual sphere (P=0.0001) and residual cylinder (P=0.02) at three-month visit. No significant differences were found in either the BCDVA or in the efficacy index. Of the 550 eyes, 91.8% reached UDVA �â�‰�¥ 1.0 (decimal), 4.1% lost 2 lines of BCDVA, 96.3% and 99% provided residual SE within �Â�± 0.5D and �Â�±1D, respectively.

Conclusions:

Myopia correction is safe and effective when is performed with Intralase�Â�®, Femto LDV�Â�®, FS200�Â�®, and Hansatome�Â�® in combination with Allegretto�Â�® excimer laser. In fact, we found equal visual results in all groups at the three-month follow up visit. Nevertheless, we observed a slightly slower visual recovery in FS200�Â�® group.

Financial Disclosure:

gains financially from competing product or procedure, travel has been funded, fully or partially, by a competing company, travel has been funded, fully or partially, by a company producing, developing or supplying the product or procedure presented, gains financially from product or procedure presented

Back to Poster listing