Official ESCRS | European Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgeons
Lisbon 2017 Delegate Registration Programme Exhibition Virtual Exhibition Satellites OneWorld Travel Discount
escrs app advert

Posters

Search Title by author or title

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurement between spectral domain ocular coherence tomography and optical low coherence reflectometry

Poster Details

First Author: D.Sousa PORTUGAL

Co Author(s):    I. Leal   L. Abegao Pinto   C. Marques-Neves              

Abstract Details

Purpose:

To compare the AngioVue�Â�®/RTVue�Â�® spectral optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and Lenstar�Â�® optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR) devices in terms of measuring central corneal thickness (CCT).

Setting:

Ophthalmology Dept., Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisboa, PT.

Methods:

Cross-sectional study. Sixty eyes of 30 patients were included. An experienced observer obtained measurements of CCT by using SD-OCT and OLCR. Measurements were performed in the same room, at the same time of the day for each patient. Only images with high-quality acquisition signal were considered. The tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki were followed. A paired t-test was used to compare both measurements. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA 13.1.

Results:

Studied population included 30 subjects (14 women), with a mean age of 28.8 �Â�± 4.2 [range 22-37] years and a spherical equivalent of -1.7 �Â�± 1.5 diopters. Mean OLCR right and left eye CCT measurements were 535.9 �Â�± 8.0 �Î�¼m and 538.5 �Â�± 7.9 �Î�¼m, respectively. Mean SD-OCT right and left eye CCT measurements were 518.6 �Â�± 7.7 �Î�¼m and 521.9 �Â�± 7.9 �Î�¼m, respectively. The paired t-test analysis found a statistically significant change between OLCR and SD-OCT measurements for both eyes (p < 0.001).

Conclusions:

In our sample, the CCT measurements obtained with OLCR were significantly higher than those obtained with the SD-OCT. The difference between means was higher than 10 �Î�¼m. These results should trigger furthers research, such as repeatability and reproducibility studies, to better elucidate how these differences may affect clinical decisions.

Financial Disclosure:

NONE

Back to Poster listing