Posters

Comparison of visual performance and subjective satisfaction among three different monofocal intraocular lenses

Poster Details

First Author: F.Poyales SPAIN

Co Author(s):    L. Rico   M. Romero   R. Perez   B. Poyales   N. Garzón        

Abstract Details

Purpose:

To evaluate visual outcomes and subjective satisfaction after implantation of three monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs)

Setting:

Miranza IOA, Madrid, Spain

Methods:

A total of 65 patients were included who underwent bilateral lens phacoemulsification surgery with symmetric implantation of monofocal IOLs. Regarding IOL implantation, 25 patients were implanted with Tecnis Eyhance ICB00 (Johnson & Johnson), 20 patients with Tecnis 1 ZCB00 (J&J) and 20 patients with Clareon CNA0T0 (Alcon Laboratories). Outcomes analyzed 1 month after surgery included monocular and corrected visual acuities at distance (DCVA) measured with ETDRS chart, near (DCNVA), and intermediate (DCIVA) measured with Radner chart (Radner Vissum, Precision Vision). In addition, the defocus curves and manifest refraction of each IOL as well as the patient satisfaction postoperatively were assessed

Results:

No statistically significant differences were found among IOL groups in CDVA (p=0.475); however, both DCNVA(p=0.007) and DCIVA (p=0.012) was better in the group implanted with Eyhance in comparison to the other two IOLs. Regarding manifest refraction postoperatively, no statistically significant differences were found among IOL groups in both spherical and cylindrical refraction (p=0.662 and p=0.394, respectively). Concerning subjective satisfaction, a statistically significance difference was found between Tecnis 1 and Clareon in the intermediate vision satisfaction (p=0.041), being better with Tecnis 1 which was very similar to Tecnis Eyhance. The defocus curve shows slightly better intermediate-distance VA outcomes for the Tecnis Eyhance

Conclusions:

Tecnis Eyhance shows slightly better intermediate-distance VA outcomes. Both monofocal Tecnis Eyhance and Tecnis 1 have shown similar visual performance as well as subjective satisfaction postoperatively in comparison to Clareon IOL which showed slightly worse general performance and satisfaction at different visual distances.

Financial Disclosure:

None