Official ESCRS | European Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgeons
Lisbon 2017 Delegate Registration Programme Exhibition Virtual Exhibition Satellites OneWorld Travel Discount
escrs app advert

Comparison of the subjective pain and clinical outcomes between small incision lenticule extraction and laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis for low myopia correction

Search Title by author or title

Session Details

Session Title: SMILE, LASIK and Re-treatment

Session Date/Time: Monday 09/10/2017 | 14:30-16:00

Paper Time: 15:15

Venue: Room 2.1

First Author: : X.Qirui CHINA

Co Author(s): :    Q. Xiao   X. Zhou   Y. Shen   J. Zhao   S. Shi   T. Wang     

Abstract Details

Purpose:

To investigate the differences in safety, efficacy, predictability, stability and subjective pain between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for low myopia correction.

Setting:

1、Key Lab of Myopia, Ministry of Health, Department of Ophthalmology, EYE & ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China 2 、Department of Optometry, Neweye Hospital, Shanghai, China 3、 Department of Ophthalmology, 85 Hospital of People’s Liberation Army, Shanghai, China

Methods:

Forty-three eyes of 30 low myopic patients (26.42±6.83years; 18 male and 12 female) were enrolled. The mean value of manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) was -2.43±0.42 diopters (D). Fifteen of them (19 eyes) underwent SMILE and the remaining 15 patients (24 eyes) underwent LASEK. The uncorrected distant visual acuity (UDVA), manifest refraction, best-corrected distant visual acuity (BDVA), corneal topography, dark-adapted pupil diameter, axial length and radius of the corneal curvature were measured preoperatively. The UDVA, manifest refraction, BDVA, corneal topography and CCT were measured again at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The subjective pain was assessed

Results:

The mean follow up period was 9.20±4.14 months . The safety indexes of SMILE and LASEK were 1.01±0.01 and 1.01±0.01, respectively. The efficacy indexes of SMILE and LASEK were 1.02±0.01 and1.01±0.02,respectively. The MRSE of the 94.7%after SMILE and 22 eyes (91.7%) after LASEK were within ±0.25D; 94.7% of the post-SMILE patients and 54.2% of the post-LASEK patients felt painless (VRS=0), 5.3% of the post-SMILE patients and 33.3% of the post-LASEK patients felt mild pain (VRS=1), 12.5% of the post-LASEK patients felt medium pain (VRS=2), and no one had severe pain (VRS=3), at 1 day postoperatively.

Conclusions:

SMILE is superior to LASEK in subjective pain at the early stage postoperatively. Both SMILE and LASEK procedures are safe, efficient, predictable and stable for low myopia correction.

Financial Disclosure:

NONE

Back to previous