PanOptix and AT LISA tri in presbyopic surgery

Session Details

Session Title: Presbyopia Management

Session Date/Time: Sunday 08/10/2017 | 16:30-18:00

Paper Time: 17:09

Venue: Room 2.1

First Author: : M.Kacerovsky CZECH REPUBLIC

Co Author(s): :    J. Kacerovska                    

Abstract Details

Purpose:

Comparison between PanOptix and AT LISA trifocal IOLs.We compared the six-month visual acuity, photic outcomes and posterior capsule opacification ( PCO) rates in patients who received bilateral Panoptic implants and AT LISA tri implants.

Setting:

Eye Clinic Horni Pocernice, Prague, Czech republic

Methods:

Bilateral implantation of PanOptix implants (n=100, 200 eyes) and AT LISA tri implants (n=100, 200 eyes). All patients underwent femtosecond laser-assisted surgery with an Alcon LenSx system- and baseline demographic and refractive error was similar in both groups. Uncorrected visual acuity at distance, near (40 cm) and at two intermediate distances ( 60 and 80 cm) were assessed. Halo and glare rates were observed. Numbers of eyes which required Nd:YAG capsulotomies for PCO after six months were compared in both groups.

Results:

Uncorrected visual acuity was similar for both trifocal IOLs at distance, near and 80 cm, but PanOptix was significantly better (p=0.039) than AT LISA tri at 60 cm distance. Halo and glare rates were similar for both trifocal IOLs. 70% of patients who received either lens experienced these phenomenas rarely or never. After six months, only one eye (0,5%) that received a PanOptix IOL required Nd: YAG capsulotomy for PCO, whereas statistically significantly more eyes ( n=12, 6%, p= 0,021) that received AT LISA tri required this procedure.

Conclusions:

Both IOLs performed in a similar way (visual acuity, halos, glare and patient satisfaction), but patients receiving PanOptix showed superior visual acuity at 60 cm and required fewer Nd: YAG procedures than those who received AT LISA tri.

Financial Disclosure:

NONE