MAIN LJUBLJANA SITE
REVIEW ABSTRACT SUBMISSION
GENERAL INFORMATION
PROGRAMME OVERVIEW
ONLINE COURSE EVALUATIONS
SYMPOSIA
FREE PAPERS
POSTERS
CORNEA DAY
LIVE SURGERY
YOUNG OPHTHALMOLOGISTS PROGRAMME
CATARACT SURGERY DIDACTIC COURSE
REFRACTIVE SURGERY DIDACTIC COURSE
BASIC OPTICS COURSE
CORNEA DIDACTIC COURSE
SLOVENIAN SOCIETY OF CATARACT & REFRACTIVE SURGEONS SYMPOSIUM
SURGICAL SKILLS TRAININGSession Title: Cornea
Session Date/Time: Sunday 16/02/2014 | 08:30-11:00
Paper Time: 10:06
Venue: Linhart Hall (Level -2)
First Author: : Peter PaulCiechanowski SWITZERLAND
Co Author(s): : Isabel Dapena Vasilis Liarakos Lamis Baydoun Korine van Dyke Lisanne Ham Gerrit J. Melles
Purpose:
To determine the causes of incomplete visual rehabilitation after DMEK.
Setting:
Retrospective cohort study at a tertiary referral center.
Methods:
Study of the last 200 eyes from a larger group of 400 consecutive DMEK surgeries on visual discomfort or unexpected subnormal visual acuity at 6 months after DMEK. For the evaluation biomicroscopy, funduscopy, Pentacam imaging, anterior segment optical coherence tomography, noncontact specular microscopy and surgical videos were used.
Results:
A total of 69 eyes (38%) out of 178 eyes that were included in the analysis, presented with incomplete visual rehabilitation after DMEK, further categorized as ‘primarily patient-related’ in 40/69 (58%), ‘primarily graft-related’ in 21/69 (30%), and a combination of ‘patient-graft related’ in 8/69 (12%) of cases. Unrecognized pre-existing ocular pathology and/or posterior segment disease in 19/69 eyes (28%), clinically significant corneal irregularities and/or central corneal scarring often secondary to long-standing preoperative corneal edema in 14/69 eyes (20%) or (partial) graft detachment in 20/69 eyes (29%), were the main causes of unexpected incomplete visual rehabilitation after DMEK. Transient or persistent monocular ghost images or diplopia occurred frequently in 10/69 eyes (14%), sometimes requiring contact lens fitting.
Conclusions:
Concomitant ocular pathology or evident graft failure may virtually always explain incomplete visual rehabilitation after DMEK in contrast to earlier endothelial keratoplasty techniques. FINANCIAL INTEREST: NONE